In 1704, Sir Isaac Newton proposed that light consists of little particles of mass. In his view, this could explain reflection, because an elastic, frictionless ball bounces off a smooth surface just like light bounces off a mirror—that is, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.
Remember that Newton was very interested in the way masses attract each other through the force of gravity. In his view, this force was responsible for refraction at the boundary between air and water. Newton imagined that matter is made up of particles of some kind, and that air would have a lower density of these particles than water. This is not far from what we know today—we would call Newton’s particles “molecules” and “atoms.” Newton then proposed that there would be an attractive force, similar to gravity, between the light particles and the matter particles.
Now, when a light particle travels within a medium, such as air or water, it is surrounded on all sides by the same number of matter particles. Newton explained that the attractive forces acting on a light particle would cancel each other out, allowing the light to travel in a straight line. However, near the air–water boundary, the light particle would feel more attracted by water than by air, given the water’s higher density of “matter particles.” Newton proposed that as the light particle moves into the water, it experiences an attractive force toward the water, which increases the light particle’s velocity component in the direction of the water, but not in the direction parallel to the water.
This velocity increase in the direction perpendicular to the air–water boundary would deflect the light closer to perpendicular to the surface, which is exactly what is observed in experiments. Newton thus claimed that the velocity of light particles is different in different transparent materials, believing that light would travel faster in water than in air. (We now know this is not the case, but we’ll get to that in a minute.)
Newton didn’t equate gravity with the attractive force between matter particles and light particles. He needed this force to be equal for all light particles crossing the boundary between two materials to explain how a prism separates white light into the colors of the rainbow. Newton proposed that the mass of a light particle depended on its color. In his view, red light particles would be more massive than violet light particles. Because of their increased inertia, red light particles would thus be deflected less when crossing the boundary between materials.
Newton’s greatness conferred credibility to his theory, but it was not the only one around. Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens had proposed an earlier, competing theory: light consists of waves. This was supported by the observation that two intersecting beams of light did not bounce off each other as would be expected if they were composed of particles. However, Huygens could not explain color, and the wave versus particle debate for the nature of light raged until decisive experiments were carried out in the nineteenth century.
Leave a Reply